醫學新知
Update
無標題文件


首頁 > 醫學新知 > 醫學新知
The Benefit of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Bone Density and Microarchitecture Persists After its Withdrawal
2016-12-05

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Nov 17:jc20162695. [Epub ahead of print]
 

Papadakis G1Hans D1Gonzalez-Rodriguez E1Vollenweider P1Waeber G1Marques-Vidal PM1Lamy O1.

Author information

  • 1Service of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (G.P., E.G.-R.), CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Center of Bone Diseases (D.H., G.R., O.L.), CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Service of Internal Medicine (P.W., G.W., M.M.-V., O.L.), CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) favorably affects bone mineral density (BMD). Whether MHT also affects bone microarchitecture, as assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS), has never been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE:

Our objective was to assess the effect of MHT on TBS and BMD before and after its withdrawal.

DESIGN:

This was a cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

This study included the general community.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS:

Data were collected from the OsteoLaus cohort (1500 women aged 50-80 years). After exclusion of women with bone-modulating treatments, 1279 women were categorized according to MHT status into current (CU), past (PU), and never (NU) users.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):

Spine TBS and BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS:

Age- and body mass index-adjusted analysis showed higher TBS values in CU vs PU or NU (1.31 ± 0.01, 1.29 ± 0.01, and 1.27 ± 0.01, respectively; P < .001). All BMD values were significantly higher in CU vs PU or NU. Compared to NU, PU exhibited higher lumbar spine (0.94 ± 0.01 vs 0.91 ± 0.01 g/cm2; P = .017) and total hip (0.86 ± 0.01 vs 0.84 ± 0.01 g/cm2; P = .026) BMD and a trend for higher TBS (P = .066). The 10-year loss of TBS and BMD at lumbar spine and total hip was significantly lower for both CU and PU vs NU. MHT duration had no effect on bone parameters. In PU, the residual effect on TBS and BMD was significantly more prominent in early discontinuers (<2 years).

CONCLUSION:

MHT is associated with bone microarchitecture preservation, as assessed by TBS. The effect of MHT on TBS and BMD persists at least 2 years after withdrawal.

PMID: 27854548 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2016-2695
資料來源:PubMed



瀏覽次數: 1306

Untitled Document